Bachs Vermächtnis – The legacy of Thomas Bach

(Geschrieben vor der Eröffnungsfeier. Written before the Opening Ceremony. See an English version below.)

Die Geschäfte laufen blendend. 4,2 Milliarden Dollar hat das Internationale Olympische Komitee (IOC) im vergangenen Jahr eingenommen. Am 31. Dezember 2021 lagerten 5,6 Milliarden auf den Konten des Olympiakonzerns. Viele Verträge mit TV-Stationen und anderen Sponsoren laufen bis 2032. Darauf sind sie mächtig stolz in Lausanne, der Capitale Olympique, und das lässt die Propaganda-Abteilung des IOC die Welt gern wissen.

IOC President Thomas Bach during the Opening Ceremony of Beijing 2022. (Photograph by IOC/Greg Martin)

Zum ersten Teil der 139. IOC-Vollversammlung in Peking verkündete zunächst der ehemalige UN-Generalsekretär Ban Ki-Moon, eine Art Maskottchen des IOC, in seiner Eigenschaft als Chef der sogenannten Ethikkommission ein paar salbungsvolle Worte. Der aktuelle UN-Generalsekretär Antonio Guterres tauchte auch wieder auf (und war im Olympiastadion an Bachs Seite). Dann wurde eine Videobotschaft von Papst Franziskus eingespielt. Am Freitag, wenige Stunden vor der Eröffnungsfeier, übergab IOC-Präsident Thomas Bach als einer der Fackelläufer die olympische Flamme an Abdulla Shahid, den amtierenden Präsidenten der Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen. Das IOC versucht alles, um das Projekt Peking 2022, das weltweit mit Begriffen wie Propagandaspiele oder Genocide Games beschrieben wird, im besten Lichte erscheinen zu lassen.

Doch die Milliarden auf den Konten und die bestellten Botschaften helfen wenig, es geht dem IOC wie einst dem Fußball-Weltverband FIFA: In demokratischen Nationen ist das Image dieser globalen Institutionen am Boden. Kein Geld der Welt kann diesen rasant Ansehensverlust aufhalten. Zumal auch die Eröffnungsfeier der Winterspiele zeigt, in welchen Kreisen sich das FDP-Mitglied Thomas Bach mit seinem IOC am wohlsten fühlt. Viele Politiker bleiben der Zeremonie fern und vollziehen den diplomatischen Boykott. Zu Gast waren allerdings zahlreiche Spezialdemokraten, Diktatoren und Despoten. Allen voran Russlands Präsident Wladimir Putin, der drauf und dran ist, nach 2008 (Georgien) und 2014 (Ukraine, Krim) zum dritten Mal die vom IOC (und den UN) stets pompös verkündete traditionelle olympische Waffenruhe zu brechen. Putin steht zudem für die irregulären Olympischen Winterspiele 2014, die das IOC längst nicht so aufgearbeitet hat, wie es im Interesse jener Sportler sein müsste, die von Putins gedopten Staatssportlern betrogen wurden.

Unmittelbar vor seinem Treffen mit Chinas Staats- und Parteichef Xi Jinping erklärte Putin selbstverständlich: „Russland ist und bleibt den traditionellen olympischen Werten verpflichtet. Wir sind gegen die Politisierung des Sports und gegen Versuche, ihn als Druckmittel, unlauteren Wettbewerb oder Diskriminierung einzusetzen.“ Es bleibt alles beim Alten. Diejenigen, die den Sport für politische Zwecke missbrauchen, palavern über olympische Werte. So war das auch 2008 bei den Sommerspielen in Peking.

Damals gab Chinas Präsident Hu Jintao die beinahe legendäre Losung aus: „Don’t mix politics with Games.“ Sein Nachfolger Xi Jinping, der damals schon das Mega-Projekt Sommerspiele leitete, sprach am Donnerstag zur IOC-Vollversammlung: „China ist ein Champion des olympischen Geistes!“

Und Juan Antonio Samaranch, jener Investmentbanker mit Filialen in China, der die IOC-Koordinierungskommission für Peking 2022 leitete, brandmarkt unentwegt diejenigen, die den Spielen fernbleiben. „Wir dürfen politische Einmischung nicht akzeptieren, sonst würden die olympischen Werte verschwinden“, das ist so ein Satz von Samaranch. „Ob Politiker den Spielen fernbleiben, hat absolut keinen Einfluss auf die Qualität der Spiele.“ 

Im Geiste seines 2010 verstorbenen Vaters Juan Antonio Samaranch Sr., der das IOC von 1980 bis 2001 führte und dem in China mehrere Museen gewidmet sind sowie eine vom Sohn geleitete Stiftung, erklärte Samaranch auch: „Peking hat die besten Sportanlagen in der Geschichte der Winterspiele. Peking ist heute wahrscheinlich der sicherste Platz auf Erden.“

War da nicht etwas? Eine Pandemie? „Wir vereinen die Menschheit nach den Schatten der Pandemie“, verkündete Xi Jinping der IOC-Session. Sein Wille geschehe.

Man sollte über derlei Botschaften nicht nur den Kopf schütteln. Auffallend ist zunächst, dass sich Samaranch Junior als Nachfolger von Thomas Bach in Position gebracht hat, sollte Bach 2025 tatsächlich aus dem Amt scheiden – sollte bis dahin nicht die Olympische Charta geändert werden, um Bach eine dritte Amtszeit zu ermöglichen, auch das ist denkbar. Samaranch Junior kam 2001 ins IOC, als sich sein Vater verabschiedete: Die Session fand in Moskau statt, unter der Schirmherrschaft von Wladimir Putin. Es war jene Session, die Peking zur Olympiastadt 2008 bestimmte, auch das war ein Abschiedsgeschenk an den alten IOC-Patron. Samaranch, Putin, Russland, China – das sind olympische Zeitläufte und Machtblöcke.

Auffallend ist auch, und das schon seit langem, wie sehr die Argumentationen von Thomas Bach und seinen Propagandisten und jene von Xi Jinping und seiner Propaganda-Armee miteinander verschmolzen. Es macht keinen Unterschied mehr, wer da spricht. Den Begriff Menschenrechte hat Thomas Bach in seiner Rede vor der IOC-Vollversammlung nicht benutzt. Nicht einmal das. Ausführlich sprach er jedoch über die „dunklen Wolken der wachsenden Politisierung des Sports“. Putin und Xi Jinping, dem er schon 2014 die höchste IOC-Auszeichnung verlieh, den Olympischen Orden, hat er damit nicht gemeint. „Die Boykott-Gespenster der Vergangenheit kamen wieder zum Vorschein“, schimpfte er.

Glaubte man im Sommer 2008, während der Sommerspiele in Peking, Bachs Vorgänger Jacques Rogge noch gewisse Schmerzen ansehen zu können, als dieser sich am Nasenring von den chinesischen KP-Bonzen durch die olympische Manege führen ließ, ist das bei Bach ganz anders. Gewiss, er kommt mächtig ins Stottern und ist sprachlich und argumentativ erschreckend schwach, wenn er die Fragen der Weltpresse beantworten muss. Erstaunlicherweise werden nicht nur die bestellten Fragen sogenannter Journalisten der chinesischen Staatsmedien zugelassen. Doch grundsätzlich ist Bach überzeugt von dem, was er macht: Die Menschheit retten, den Weltfrieden sowieso – und natürlich mit den Propaganda-Winterspielen die Pandemie besiegen.

Wenn über politische Vereinnahmung des Sports geredet wird, wird ein Aspekt deshalb meistens sträflich vernachlässigt: Dieses IOC muss sich nicht vereinnahmen lassen. Bach regiert das IOC so, wie Putin in Russland und Xi Jinping China regieren. Diskurs gibt es nicht im IOC. Und wenn Bachs Sätze einen Sinn ergeben sollten, dann diesen: Über Menschenrechte zu reden, Menschenrechte auch nur einzufordern, ist „Politisierung des Sports“, die man ablehnen und bekämpfen muss.

Das ist das Vermächtnis des deutschen IOC-Präsidenten.


Sie möchten Recherche-Journalismus und olympische Bildung finanzieren?
Do you want to support investigative journalism and Olympic education?

SPORT & POLITICS Shop.
Subscribe to my Olympic newsletter: via Mailchimp and Revue.


The legacy of Thomas Bach

Business is booming. 4.2 billion dollars were collected by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) last year. On 31 December 2021, there was 5.6 billion in the Olympic group’s accounts. Many contracts with TV stations and other sponsors run until 2032. They are mighty proud of that in Lausanne, the Capitale Olympique, and the IOC’s propaganda department likes to let the world know that.

At the first part of the 139th IOC General Assembly in Beijing, former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, a kind of mascot of the IOC, first announced a few unctuous words in his capacity as head of the so-called Ethics Commission. The current UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres also reappeared (and was at Bach’s side in the Olympic stadium). Then a video message from Pope Francis was played. On Friday, a few hours before the opening ceremony, IOC President Thomas Bach, as one of the torchbearers, handed over the Olympic flame to Abdulla Shahid, the acting president of the United Nations General Assembly. The IOC is trying everything to present the Beijing 2022 project, which is described worldwide with terms like propaganda games or Genocide Games, in the best light.

But the billions in the accounts and the messages ordered are of little help, the IOC is doing like FIFA, the world football association, once did: in democratic nations, the image of these global institutions is at rock bottom. No amount of money in the world can stop this rapid loss of prestige. Especially since the opening ceremony of the Winter Games shows in which circles FDP member Thomas Bach feels most comfortable with his IOC. Many politicians stayed away from the ceremony and carried out the diplomatic boycott. However, numerous special democrats, dictators and despots were guests. First and foremost Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, who is on the verge of breaking the traditional Olympic truce, always pompously proclaimed by the IOC (and the UN), for the third time after 2008 (Georgia) and 2014 (Ukraine, Crimea). Putin also stands for the irregular 2014 Winter Olympics, which the IOC has by no means dealt with as it should in the interest of those athletes who were cheated by Putin’s doped state athletes.

Immediately before his meeting with China’s state and party leader Xi Jinping, Putin of course said, „Russia is and remains committed to traditional Olympic values. We are against the politicisation of sport and attempts to use it as a tool of pressure, unfair competition or discrimination.“ Everything remains the same. Those who abuse sport for political purposes palaver about Olympic values. It was the same at the 2008 Summer Games in Beijing.

At that time, China’s President Hu Jintao issued the almost legendary slogan: „Don’t mix politics with games.“ His successor Xi Jinping, who was then already in charge of the Summer Games mega-project, addressed the IOC General Assembly on Thursday: „China is a champion of the Olympic spirit!“

And Juan Antonio Samaranch, that investment banker with branches in China who headed the IOC Coordination Commission for Beijing 2022, steadfastly brands those who stay away from the Games. „We must not accept political interference, otherwise the Olympic values would disappear,“ is one of Samaranch’s phrases. „Whether politicians stay away from the Games has absolutely no influence on the quality of the Games.“ 

In the spirit of his father Juan Antonio Samaranch Sr, who died in 2010, led the IOC from 1980 to 2001 and to whom several museums are dedicated in China, as well as a foundation run by his son, Samaranch also said, „Beijing has the best sports facilities in the history of the Winter Games. Beijing is probably the safest place on earth today.“

Wasn’t there something? A pandemic? „We unite humanity after the shadows of the pandemic,“ Xi Jinping announced to the IOC session. His will be done.

One should not just shake one’s head at such messages. First of all, it is striking that Samaranch Junior has positioned himself as Thomas Bach’s successor should Bach actually leave office in 2025 – should the Olympic Charter not be amended by then to allow Bach a third term, that is also conceivable. Samaranch Junior came to the IOC in 2001, when his father was taking his leave: the session was held in Moscow, under the patronage of Vladimir Putin. It was the session that chose Beijing as the 2008 Olympic city, which was also a farewell gift to the old IOC patron. Samaranch, Putin, Russia, China – these are Olympic timelines and power blocs.

It is also striking, and has been for a long time, how much the arguments of Thomas Bach and his propagandists and those of Xi Jinping and his propaganda army have merged. It no longer makes any difference who is speaking. Thomas Bach did not use the term human rights in his speech to the IOC General Assembly. Not even that. He did, however, speak at length about the „dark clouds of the growing politicisation of sport“. He was not referring to Putin and Xi Jinping, to whom he already awarded the highest IOC honour, the Olympic Order, in 2014. „The boycott ghosts of the past resurfaced,“ he scolded.

If in the summer of 2008, during the Summer Games in Beijing, one could still see some pain in Bach’s predecessor Jacques Rogge when he let himself be led through the Olympic ring on a nose ring by the Chinese Communist Party bigwigs, it is quite different with Bach. Certainly, he stutters mightily and is frighteningly weak in terms of language and arguments when he has to answer the questions of the world press. Surprisingly, not only the ordered questions of so-called journalists from the Chinese state media are admitted. But basically, Bach is convinced of what he is doing: saving humanity, world peace anyway – and of course defeating the pandemic with the propaganda Winter Games.

When people talk about political appropriation of sport, one aspect is therefore usually criminally neglected: this IOC does not have to be appropriated. Bach rules the IOC the way Putin rules Russia and Xi Jinping rules China. Discourse does not exist in the IOC. And if Bach’s sentences were to make any sense, it would be this: To talk about human rights, even to demand human rights, is „politicisation of sport“, which must be rejected and fought.

This is the legacy of the German IOC President.

The IOC itself is a totalitarian system. More than ever. The IOC has never been as authoritarian as it is under Thomas Bach. Thomas Bach is the North Korean Great Leader, Putin, MBS and Xi Jinping all rolled into one. Even Juan Antonio Samaranch Sr. did not have such absolute power. No IOC president ever had such absolute power before. The IOC under Samaranch, as I studied it from 1991 onwards, including the coverage of more than 40 IOC sessions until today, was a democratic institution compared to today’s IOC, with factions, with different opinions, with different interests.

Bach has basically also broken up the so-called pillars of the Olympic movement, or two of these three pillars, beyond recognition: ANOC and GAISF, i.e. the NOC and the Olympic IF. The final work is still ongoing, I will describe this in detail in a background piece these days. What remains is one pillar: the IOC.

Bach is the propaganda grandmaster. He is responsible for the most shameful Winter Olympics ever, the 2014 in Sochi, an irregular competition whose integrity the IOC apparently did not even want to guarantee – to this day, this scandal has not been dealt with as it should be. Now he is also responsible for the Genocide and Propaganda Games in Beijing. A German from the country that hosted the Nazi Olympics in Berlin and Garmisch-Partenkirchen and stands for the dirty appropriation of the Olympics by mass murderers, this German is the proud partner of the Chinese leadership. That says it all.

Bach knows he has no arguments. When I asked him about concentration camps for the Uyghurs (yes, I deliberately said concentration camps, not labour camps or re-education camps) at a press conference back in late 2019, he didn’t contradict the term. That was highly interesting for me, who studied him for 30 years: Normally he is routine and sees his chance and would have pointed out to me that I, as a German, should be careful when using the term concentration camp. He did not. That was amazing. And that clearly told me how insecure he is, that he sees that he is in a losing position argumentatively.

60 of the current 101 IOC members became members under President Bach. I already proved this with figures in 2014, one year after he took office: No IOC president before him has ever changed the membership at such a pace and shaped it to his liking. Here, too, we can tick off some points that apply to authoritarian systems. Officially, of course, the commission headed by Princess Anne is responsible for nominating new members (with the exception of athletes, and in the case of those Bach also nominates in individual cases). Joke.

But what Bach does is only one side of the coin. The other side of the coin: IOC members (whether they are athletes‘ representatives, representatives of the NOK, representatives of the IF and thus ex officio members, or personal members) naturally also have a responsibility. And they are not living up to this responsibility. It is disgusting, indecent, embarrassing, unworthy, how the IOC members have paid homage to their Great Leader during the past sessions (especially in 2020 and 2021 during the virtual sessions). They even call him that, Great Leader, Leader etc… it is totalitarianism pure and simple.

The propaganda that Bach and his propaganda servants are spouting about humanity is also indecent, filthy and disgusting.

Bach leaves nothing to chance. Everything is planned. Everything follows a big script. This IOC is a disgrace. I say this as someone who, over many years, has always tried to understand the IOC from the inside, so to speak, who wanted to get close to and understand the system and the members.

Bach loves the notion that one (sport) must speak with one voice. And he brutally makes sure that it does. Anyone who opposes him on even the smallest of occasions has no future in the Olympic family.

Bach is a vain potentate who sees himself on a par with world leaders – elected presidents and heads of government. He has his advisers count how many important politicians he meets. Olympic money is used to infiltrate the so-called good governance industry and political institutions. and in the end, today in Beijing, he is actually be on a par with numerous heads of state and government again.

Most of them, however, do not come from democratic nations. He is on a par with Ursupators, Dictators and Murderers (MBS et. Al). That is how he is seen in the free world – and that is a good thing.

It is deserved.


6 Gedanken zu „Bachs Vermächtnis – The legacy of Thomas Bach“

  1. Pingback: Was war. Was wird. Wo ist der Kanzler und andere offene Fragen | Technische Nachrichten, Gadget-Testberichte, Notebooks, Handys

  2. Pingback: What was. what will. Where is the Chancellor and other open questions - California18

  3. Pingback: Was war. Was wird. Wo ist der Kanzler und andere offene Fragen - Fast Digital News

  4. Pingback: War Was war. Was wird. Wo ist der Kanzler und andere offene Fragen – U-News

  5. Pingback: Jens Weinreich - The legacy of Thomas Bach - Brave New Europe

  6. Pingback: Was war. Was wird. Wo ist der Kanzler und andere offene Fragen - Drise News

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.