This is a good day for clean cycling and it would get better if Hein Verbruggan and Pat McQuaid took the honourable course and resigned.
— David Walsh (@DavidWalshST) October 22, 2012
Noch läuft die Pressekonferenz des Radsport-Weltverbandes UCI in Genf, die ich live online auf n24 verfolge. Präsident Pat McQuaid hat Kreide gefressen.
Radsport hat eine Zukunft. Die UCI hat eine Zukunft.
Die Entscheidung der UCI in Kurzfassung:
- The UCI will not appeal the reasoned decision of USADA in the case of Lance Armstrong.
- The UCI will recognize and implement the reasoned decision of USADA.
- The UCI will disqualify all competitive results achieved by Mr Armstrong from 1 August 1998 thereon; the sporting consequences of such disqualification on the rankings to be discussed by the UCI Management Committee during an upcoming extraordinary meeting.
Das Meeting findet kommenden Freitag statt.
Und Lance Armstrong hat er schon vergessen.
Pat McQuaid, UCI president: “Lance Armstrong has no place in cycling. He deserves to be forgotten in cycling.” Sounds a bit too easy, guys.
— Jens Weinreich (@jensweinreich) October 22, 2012
Die UCI akzeptiert im Grunde die überwältigenden Unterlagen, die von der USADA vorgelegt wurden.
Ein UCI-Dossier wurde den anwesenden Journalisten verteilt. Online kann ich noch nichts finden. Ich glaube, der Server, der die UCI Webseite unterhält, ist unter dem Ansturm zusammengebrochen.
Das ist die größte Krise in der Geschichte der UCI.
Aber McQuaid hält es mit John F. Kennedy und den Chinesen. Das Wort Krise bestehe in Chinesisch aus zwei Schriftzeichen: Eins stehe für Gefahr. Eines für Chancen.
David Walsh sagt ...
Die juristischen Attacken der UCI gegen Paul Kimmage, dessen journalistische Aufklärungsarbeit in Sachen Doping er schätze (!), habe nichts mit dem USADA Report zu tun, nichts mit Lance Armstrong und der UCI – nur damit, dass Kimmage ihm, Pat McQuaid und Hein Verbruggen, dem vormaligen UCI-Präsidenten, unterstelle, sie seien korrupt.
Eins hat Pat McQuaid begriffen, wenngleich es bei ihm wie eine Ausrede klingt:
Das hat Pat McQuaid begriffen: gegen die Dopingmafia hilft nur das Strafrecht! gegen dopende Großverdiener, Profis, Athleten genannt #UCI
— Jens Weinreich (@jensweinreich) October 22, 2012
Jetzt wird es noch peinlicher, als er über das Geld von Lance Armstrong spricht. Spende für die Entwicklung des Radsports. OMG.
The UCI recognises USADA decision in Amrstrong case
The UCI has completed its review of USADA’s ‘Reasoned Decision’ and appendices in the case against Lance Armstrong.
The UCI considered the main issues of jurisdiction, the statute of limitation the evidence gathered by USADA and the sanction imposed upon Mr. Armstrong.
The UCI confirms that it will not appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport and that it will recognise the sanction that USADA has imposed.
The USADA decision explains how riders on the USPS Team showed no inclination to share the full extent of what they knew until they were subpoenaed or called by federal investigators and that their only reason for telling the truth is because the law required them to do so.
These riders have confronted their past and told their stories. Their accounts of their past provide a shocking insight into the USPS Team where the expression to ‘win at all costs’ was redefined in terms of deceit, intimidation, coercion and evasion.
Their testimony confirms that the anti-doping infrastructure that existed at that time was, by itself, insufficient and inadequate to detect the practices taking place within the team. The UCI has always been the first international sporting federation to embrace new developments in the fight against doping and it regrets that the anti-doping infrastructure that exists today was not available at that time so as to render such evasion impossible.
Many of the USPS Team riders have already acknowledged that the culture of cycling has now changed and that young riders today are no longer confronted with the same choices to use performance enhancing drugs. They are right to do so.
The UCI has recognized the problem of doping within the sport and taken significant steps to confront the problem and to clean up cycling. Today’s riders are subject to the most innovative and effective anti-doping procedures and regulations in sport. Cycling has been a pioneer in the fight against doping in sport under the leadership of the UCI and this role has been recognised by WADA.
Today’s young riders do not deserve to be branded or tarnished by the past or to pay the price for the Armstrong era. Cycling has a future and those who will define that future can be found among the young generation of riders who have chosen to prove that you can compete and win clean.
Riders who were caught doping continue to do the sport a disservice by protesting that the UCI refused to engage with them. The reality is that these riders never contemplated such action until they were found positive by the UCI, and even then they refused to confess and co-operate with the UCI.
Those riders who made the choice to stop using performance enhancing drugs, and to share their stories to enable the new generation of riders to learn from the mistakes that were made in the past, can continue to support clean cycling.
The role that training and education has to play in discouraging doping at all levels is well recognised by the UCI. The UCI will engage with any rider that is willing to work with them in the fight against doping and interested in establishing what lessons can be learned and applied to its ‘True Champion or Cheat?” programme which is obligatory for all riders subject to anti-doping tests.
This is not the first time cycling has reached a crossroads or that it has had to begin anew and to engage in the painful process of confronting its past. It will do so again with renewed vigor and purpose and its stakeholders and fans can be assured that it will find a new path forward.
That process extends beyond the UCI and the anti-doping agencies including WADA, USADA, AFLD and CONI must contribute to it by also examining how many times they tested Lance Armstrong and by providing their own explanation for why he never tested positive in the tests that they respectively conducted.
The UCI tested Tyler Hamilton 40 times and found him positive. It tested Floyd Landis 46 times and found him positive as the winner of the Tour de France. The list of riders that it has found positive does not end there.
The UCI has tested Lance Armstrong 218 times. If Lance Armstrong was able to beat the system then the responsibility for addressing that rests not only with the UCI but also with WADA and all of the other anti-doping agencies who accepted the results.
The UCI supports WADA’s decision to create a working group to examine ‘The Ineffectiveness of the Fight Against Doping in Sport’ and proposes that it commence its work by examining the effectiveness of the system in place to detect the use of performance enhancing substances in cycling.
The UCI is committed to reviewing the environment upon which the sport operates in order to ensure that something like this never happens again. It has convened a special meeting of its Management Committee on Friday, October 26th to begin the process of examining the existing structures and introducing changes to safeguard the future of cycling.
UCI Communications Service
Das Original als pdf:
T. Bach: Spätestens jetzt wäre es für L. #Armstrong an der Zeit, sich umfassend zu äußern. Dies wäre für ihn selbst + für Sport hilfreich.
— DOSB (@DOSB) October 22, 2012