The Institute of National Anti-doping Organization has been established by the United States, Australia, Britain, Canada and Norway. Twenty-four nations attended the first INADO meeting last month and the search for a chief executive begins next month as the organization expands.

Leaders of the fledgling advocacy group insist they are not establishing a rival to the World Anti-Doping Agency, but trying to ensure nations speak with a unified voice as the WADA code is reviewed.

Non Compliant Signatories :

Africa: 22

Angola
Benin
Burkina Faso
Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea Bissau
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Mauritania
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Sierra Leone
Somalia
Uganda
Zambia

America: 7

Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Dominican Republic
Guyana
Haiti
Uruguay

Asia: 9

Afghanistan
Cambodia
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
Maldives
Palestine
Tajikistan
Timor-Leste
Turkmenistan
Yemen

Europe: 7.5

Albania
Andora
Belgium (German Community*)
Belgium (City of Brussels*)
Greece
Malta
Monaco
Portugal
San Marino

* In Belgium, four different NADOs have formally accepted the Code. Each counts for .25

Oceania: 3

Kiribati
Palau
Solomon Islands

http://www.wada-ama.org/en/World-Anti-Doping-Program/Sports-and-Anti-Doping-Organizations/The-Code/Code-Compliance–Reporting/Compliance-Report—Nov—2011/

“Und wenn keiner handelt, halte ich eine Frage für sehr angebracht: Warum haben wir überhaupt diese internationale Agentur mit der Verantwortung für Überwachung und Berichterstattung, wenn, sobald sie überwacht und berichtet, keiner irgendetwas tut?”

Von mehr als 60 sind nur 35 gelistet. Die anderen kommen ihrer Berichtspflicht offenkundig nicht nach, mithin sind hier Verstöße gegen den WADA-Code festgehalten.
[...]
Über die Hälfte der gelisteten Verbände, nämlich 18 von 35, haben im letzten Jahr mit ihren Kontrollen keinen einzigen Doper überführt.
[...]
Auffälligste Lücke in der Länderliste: Es fehlt die Sportgroßmacht Brasilien

WADA: 2010 Anti-Doping Organization Activity Summary

Bis zum vergangenen Mittwoch hat die Wada wider besseres Wissen keine Warnung vor dem Genuss von Fleisch in Mexiko herausgegeben.

Florian Bauer für den DLF: Fußballer voll mit Kälbermastmittel – Straffrei wegen kontaminierten mexikanischen Fleischs

Die Sportwächter verhalten sich wie eine Polizei, die es nach einem Banküberfall für überflüssig hält, die Bilder der Überwachungskamera zu sichten: Ach nö, lass mal, die Gangster waren so clever – die waren gewiss sowieso maskiert.

Dopingproben gehören für die Sportler bei nationalen und internationalen Wettbewerben zum Alltag. Doch welcher Athlet wird aus welchen Gründen auf welche Substanzen untersucht? Hajo Seppelt und Robert Kempe (WDR) berichten über die Praktiken der Verbände.

nur 1,4 Millionen für Dopingtests, also magere fünf Prozent ihrer Ausgaben. [...] 2002 steckte die Wada noch 3,9 Millionen in Kontrollen, das waren seinerzeit mehr als 20 Prozent ihres Jahresetats.

Wird der Wada-Etat nicht aufgestockt, bleibt Antidopingpolitik im Weltmaßstab, was sie ist – eine ziemlich leere Parole.

Operations by governmental units, such as the police and customs, have unmasked drug use, for example BALCO in the USA and Operación Puertoin spain.

I can´t share the view that the OP is an appropriate example on how governmental bodies can contribute to equal und just treatment of drug affairs. Operacion Puertoin represents unfortunatly just the contrary as we had to recognize in Germany by the case of Jan Ullrich.
Three years have passed and no final decision could be taken. Besides that the majority of results made public as the involvement of more than 200 individuals and various kinds of sports in the affair were not further investigated by the Spanisah responsible bodies.

Anti-doping has become an industry. It will be a challenge to ensure the money is spent efficiently.

I doubt that the problems arising from the abuse of drugs inside sports can be only diminished by providing more money. We have to reconsider the generell approach towards properly governing the illness. Concentrating upon prevention, education of youth and restructering the responsible organs and bodies. To have a more critical look on sports as its role and significance in societies and in the internationale communities is concerned, would be more than necessary. We should not believe as it runs it runs well. Even bigger international events don´t contribute and create a challenge to WADA it can´t easily burden. Wouldn´t it be more sufficient to allow only countries to participate in such events which respect fully the international obligations of anti drug policies ?

It was reported in Stockholm that WADA now intervenes in Russia, India, Brazil, Nigeria, Jamaica and Turkey. Of particular importance is the situation in Russia, a superpower in sport. There are some positive signs: an independent anti-doping organization (RUSADA) is now established, Russia has now allowed WADA to send doping control officers (with multiple business visa) to carry out unannounced tests, they can now bring the necessary equipment, and it was reported that the parties are close to a solution regarding bringing biological samples out of Russia.

Here I was just surprised how sport nations as Russia are lacking behind the developments considered already as normal in certain countries.